Sunday, October 31, 2010

Session 5: Genesis 12-50 (Isaac, Jacob, Joseph)

If you desire a full summary of our session for ‘Thinking through the Bible’ on Sunday mornings, send your request by email to carlsonpj@gmail.com. This blog is a summary of what Paul presented, as well as what others shared during the session. If you are teaching this to others, you may want to read the full set of notes available to you in order to give your students more guidelines.

As we read through the journeys of faith of the patriarchs in Genesis, I wonder if there is any difference between tests and temptations. I was thinking about this because I’ve often heard someone blaming Satan for their failures: ‘The devil made me do it.’ I don’t read anywhere in Genesis that God tempted anyone. In the King James translation, Genesis 22:1 is sometimes translated as: ‘God did tempt Abraham’. Because we understand ‘tempt’ to give the idea of ‘entice to do wrong’, later translations say: ‘God tested Abraham’, because the Hebrew word carries with it the meaning of ‘proving’, ‘testing’, ‘putting to the test’. As I read God’s Story in Genesis I see the patriarchs struggle between relying on what was familiar to them and trusting in God’s limited revelation.   

It is worth noting that Abraham continually dealt with his sin at the altar so that he did not have an obsession with his failures in his journey of faith. He somehow realized that God takes care of his sin, and it was Abraham’s responsibility to walk with God as God continued His work in and through him. God deals with sin definitively, and His way of dealing with it is forgiveness.

Before we continue with the remaining journeys in faith of the patriarchs in Genesis, we should understand the references to the Canaanites…

The Canaanites lived in the land God promised Abraham. Ethnic people are often grouped together, so that the Canaanites include the ‘Amorites’, ‘Phoenicians’, ‘Amalekites’ ‘Edomites’, and ‘Philistines’. They are viewed together because of their similar religious culture and common opposition to the Hebrews (with the exception of the Phoenicians). The Philistines do not truly fit this group, but they took on the culture and religion of the Canaanites. The religion of the Canaanites did not differ greatly from Assyria and Babylonia. The Canaanites chiefly worshipped ‘Baal’ as the god of rain and fertility. Baal’s companion was ‘Asherah’, a fertility goddess. An ‘Asherah’ was a wooden pole set up near altars to Baal. The common cultic fertility rites included prostitution and in some places child sacrifice.

Isaac was linked to the covenant promise as part of Abraham’s household: “I am the God of your father Abraham; do not fear, for I am with you. I will bless you and multiply your descendants for My servant Abraham’s sake” (Genesis 26:24). But Isaac needed his own journey of faith. The testing of faith came through the selection of Rebekah as his bride (Genesis 24); the favoritism they showed towards their sons, Jacob and Esau (Genesis 25); following his father’s footsteps in going down to Abimelech during a famine, and falling into the same sin of deception (Genesis 26:1-11); the grief brought to the family by his son Esau marrying women of Canaan (Genesis 26:34-35); while on his deathbed, his son Jacob deceived him in order to receive a blessing (Genesis 27). Someone shared, each one is unique with different personalities – Abraham was more social with God, while Isaac was more passive, with Rebekah being more of the leader. When Isaac repeated the sin of his father by saying that his wife was his sister, it shows that we don’t easily learn from others. Both Abraham and Isaac’s wives were their half sisters. We usually do not learn from experience alone, but from evaluated experience.

On two occasions the Lord appeared to Isaac and renewed with him the promises given to Abraham (Genesis 26:2-5, 23-25). On the second occasion Isaac built an altar to the Lord, which is the only time this is recorded of him. Contrast this with the numerous times Abraham built altars for sacrifice. Each sacrifice was a way of life for him. Each sacrifice left him with less of self and more of God. It all started with God’s command to ‘go’. In the days of the patriarchs, people did not move more than ten miles from home, so it was a major move for Abraham.

In Isaac’s old age Jacob obtained the patriarchal blessing from his father by deceit, under the direction of Rebekah (Genesis 27:1-29). After escaping the hatred of his brother, Esau, while he lay asleep, the Lord appeared to him in a dream, renewing the promises made to Abraham and Isaac, and giving him a special promise of personal care: “I am the Lord God of Abraham your father and the God of Isaac; the land on which you lie I will give to you and your descendants. Also your descendants shall be as the dust of the earth; you shall spread abroad to the west and the east, to the north and the south; and in you and in your seed all the families of the earth shall be blessed. Behold, I am with you and will keep you wherever you go, and will bring you back to this land; for I will not leave you until I have done what I have spoken to you” (Genesis 28:13-15). But Jacob needed his own journey of faith. The gracious and just hand of the sovereign God is seen through the bitter struggle Jacob encounters in marrying Leah and then having to work seven more years for Rachel, the one he originally intended to marry (Genesis 29:1-30). He received a little payback after deceiving Isaac when Laban deceived him with his daughters. God blessed Jacob with twelve sons in spite of his prayerlessness and the rivalry of Rachel and Leah, who competed for his affections by bearing him sons (Genesis 29:31-30:24). When we focus on Jacob’s wives we see how they continued in idolatry, but the story focuses on God keeping His covenant with Abraham’s household. Throughout Jacob’s scheming and the pagan idolatry of his household God remained faithful to His promises: Then the Lord said to Jacob, “Return to the land of your fathers and to your family, and I will be with you” (Genesis 31:3). Jacob began to respond to God in prompt obedience: So Jacob sent and called Rachel and Leah to the field… Then Jacob rose and set his sons and his wives on camels… to go to his father Isaac in the land of Canaan (Genesis 31:4, 17-18). After a life of deceit and rebellion, Jacob finally identified himself with God’s Abrahamic covenant, and he began to apply himself to the covenant promise: “Deliver me, I pray… For You said, ‘I will surely treat you well and make your descendants as the sand of the sea, which cannot be numbered for multitude’’ (Genesis 32:11, 12). Jacob finally settled down near the city of Shechem, and his family became defiled with the sin and shame of the Canaanites, who sought to intermarry with them (Genesis 34).
Some shared: They kept their idols, but the carved images are not what is significant for us, but what we really trust in. Our idols may be harder to deal with than actual carvings because they are so much a part of our lives, such as cars, possessions, money, attitudes, cultural customs, lying, and individualism. When God does not work things out according to our expectations so that we rely on our customs, we have made our ‘lifestyle’ an idol.

Ask Isaac and Jacob what it would be like to live contrary to God’s covenant and still hear God would keep His agreement? Think of the trials and pains the wives of these patriarchs experienced. Consider their persistence in idolatry, their struggle with deceitful fathers and husbands, their polygamous marriages, and their struggles in seeking to identify themselves through their children.

The household that received the Abrahamic covenant, passed on through the households of Isaac and Jacob, began to intermarry with the cursed Canaanites and risked the loss of their distinctive identity (Genesis 38). God addressed this risk by sending Joseph ahead of them into Egypt where they were to be segregated (Genesis 43:32). In His mercy, God preserved them as a family. In Egypt He preserved them until they had become a great nation and the iniquity of the Amorites was full (Genesis 15:13-16). Living in Canaan the family lived in hedonism (idolatry and self-indulgence); living in Egypt they were humiliated. God was dealing with their pride. Like his father Jacob on his deathbed (Genesis 48:21), Joseph expressed firm confidence in God’s covenant: “I am dying; but God will surely visit you, and bring you out of this land to the land to which He swore to Abraham, to Isaac, and to Jacob” (Genesis 50:24-25). But Joseph needed his own journey of faith. Genesis 37-48 describes the journey. His testing of faith came through parental favoritism that promoted family discord, deception, and the disappearance of Joseph as the preferred son (Genesis 37:3), which included slavery in Egypt, interpreting prisoners’ and Pharaoh’s dreams, and being overseer of Potiphar’s house where he was tempted by the master’s wife; his journey continued with his rise to power over the house of Pharaoh; encounters with his brothers in Egypt; his father’s journey to Egypt and settlement in Goshen. Throughout Joseph’s journey of faith, “the Lord was with Joseph” (see Genesis 39:3, 21, 23), preserving him through hardship, granting him wisdom, giving him skills in political economy and statesmanship, authority to help reconcile his shattered family, and passing on the Abrahamic covenant through him. What kind of questions would go through your mind as you lived alongside Joseph in his journey of faith?
Some shared: Joseph’s brothers are jealous of him but it seems that initially he was ignorant of this. There does not seem to be a whole lot of pride displayed by Joseph. After his encounter with his brothers in Egypt, Joseph acknowledges that although their actions were intended for evil, God intended them for good. The story seems to imply that Joseph believed that God was truly with him. He may have looked back on his dreams and knew that something good was coming. He took no personal credit for his dreams and being able to interpret them. Even though Joseph was spoiled by his father, he was still righteous. Jacob may have realized the mistakes he made with his older sons, so Joseph was blessed with a different upbringing. There is no reference Joseph of building any altars, which gives us an occasion to see that God sometimes works in those who look like they have no faith. It was suggested that the patriarchal fathers performed as priests for their households, so that Joseph as the son of Jacob the patriarch was not responsible for sacrifices.





God prepares Jacob’s household for the future by allowing him to bless his sons with prophetic words. Now named Israel, Jacob blesses each son. As the story unfolds you will want to refer to these words:
·         Reuben was Jacob’s eldest, who once excelled in honor and power. But he lost his birthright and received what was closer to a curse because he had defiled his father’s bed (Genesis 35:22).
·         Simeon and Levi were judged for their vices of violence and fury, which were shown in incidents like the one in Genesis 34:25-31.
·         Judah is told that “Your father’s children shall bow down before you” (Genesis 49:8). This may be that the birthright due to the eldest (Reuben) was given to him because Reuben forfeited it by his immorality, and the next two brothers had forfeited it by their violence.
·         Zebulun would later be allocated land that, while not directly on the coast, was close to where Jacob said it would be.
·         Issachar inherited good land without having to struggle for it.
·         Dan was allocated land near the northern boundary of Israel. This tribe was known for preventing enemies from entering the land of Israel.
·         Gad, who settled east of the Jordan, was exposed to many attacks. The men of Gad were renowned as fighters.
·         Asher settled north of Mount Carmel in very good farm land.
·         Naphtali was a tribe that is described as producing either ‘beautiful fawns’ or ‘beautiful words’ (Genesis 49:21).
·         Joseph received blessings comparable to those of Judah because he was the one who truly knew God. He was represented in his two sons, Ephraim and Manasseh (Genesis 48:20).
·         Benjamin’s future was said to involve strength and success, but also cruelty.
In the final chapters of Genesis we see quite a transformation in Jacob. His journey ends well. There is a lot more going on for the patriarchal households than getting to a destination. And there’s a lot more going on than what we are doing. They didn’t just wait around, but lived in hope, because they grew in knowing what God could do for them what they could not do for themselves.

Genesis begins with “God” but ends “in the coffin”.

Prepare for our next session by reading and thinking about Exodus 1-19…

Sunday, October 24, 2010

Session 4: Genesis 12-50 (Abraham)

If you desire a full summary of our session for ‘Thinking through the Bible’ on Sunday mornings, send your request by email to carlsonpj@gmail.com. This blog is a summary of what Paul presented, as well as what others shared during the session. If you are teaching this to others, you may want to read the full set of notes available to you in order to give your students more guidelines.


This is what happens when you try to bring God’s earthly name into Genesis.

How much have you really been ‘thinking’ while reading Genesis? Let’s take another quick quiz:
1. Who sounded the first bell in the Bible?
2. When is money first mentioned in the Bible?
3. Who is the first economist in the Bible?
4. Which of the United States is mentioned in the Bible?
5. When is smoking first mentioned in the Bible?
6. Who is the straightest man in the Bible?
7. When is tennis mentioned in the Bible?

By way of clarification from our last lesson where God did not explicitly explain the reason why He rejected Cain’s offering, we should remember that our fundamental approach is not to superimpose our concepts and notions on the text so that we miss the flow of God’s Story to us. God did not record for us in Genesis why He accepted Abel’s offering and why He rejected Cain’s offering. We simply need to accept that as a fact so far in the story. For those who want to dwell a little longer on this incident, it is worth noting that the meaning of an ‘offering’ in Genesis 4:4-5 is ‘tribute’. This is why some translations render it as a ‘present’, ‘gift’, or ‘oblation’. This could be a ‘vegetable offering’ or ‘blood sacrifice’. This takes it beyond a sin offering for atonement to an offering of ‘thanksgiving’. Think of this in contrast to when Noah made ‘burnt offerings’ after the Flood in Genesis 8:20, these are offerings of dedication to God and propitiation (covering) for sin. I would rather ask Cain about sin crouching at his door, because I heard God talk to him about that, than talk to him about the types of offerings, which would only lead to the first two denominations: the ‘meat gatherers’; and the ‘veggie gatherers’.



We ended our last session without covering two ‘In the beginnings…’ We will return to the session notes and look at ‘In the beginning the FLOOD’; and ‘In the beginning BABEL’. Here are some of the responses to ‘In the beginning the FLOOD’: People were not just committing sins, but were thinking evil continually. They were well-practiced in evil during their long lives. God was tremendously grieved. In His sovereignty, God decided who should live and who should die, and He does this without explanation. In His mercy He saved the children of that generation from the evil intent in their hearts. An omnipresent God must have been bombarded with evil as He contended with mankind’s evil thoughts. God addressed the violence that He detested.
Here are some of the responses to ‘In the beginning BABEL’: It was man’s way of reaching God versus God’s way. There was a united front against God. There was a rebellion against the command to be fruitful and multiply as they gathered in one locality against God. There is no counsel or wisdom against God – no one can trump God’s plan. In Genesis 11:8 they were looking for a city, but it was the wrong one. They sought city dwelling due to rebellion against God’s command. Cain looked for a city, a social system, because he could no longer work the ground. Genesis 11:3 says, “Come let us”, and in verse 7 God says, “Come let Us” (the triune God).

Remember that God’s Story related in Genesis easily falls into two main sections: God’s dealings with humans in general (chs. 1-11); God’s dealings with those He has chosen to be His special people (chs. 12-50), which we now move into…

There are five patriarchal fathers: Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Joseph, and Job (not mentioned in Genesis, but it is suggested he fits just after Genesis 11:26, possibly making him forty years old at Noah’s death). These were heads of households or tribes. In Genesis, the patriarchs were sometimes inspired to declare a name of God in response to a ‘theophany’, a wondrous experience of the presence of God. They were so overwhelmed by God's visitation that they had to frame it with a title. It was a spontaneous act of worship. For example, when Abraham prepared to sacrifice his son Isaac, God provided a ram for the offering in Isaac's stead, prompting Abraham to declare that he now understood God as “Yahweh-Yireh”, meaning “The Lord Will Provide” (Genesis 22:14).

In the truest sense, there actually was no covenant in the Bible with Abraham, nor with Adam, nor with Noah. Every time God makes a covenant in the Bible, He always makes it ‘with you and your seed’ (descendants). God makes covenants with families, and in so doing, He binds us together. No individual stands alone in a covenant with God; families are in covenant with each other in the covenant with God.

God’s relationship with Abram begins by setting him apart with a promise in Genesis 12:1-3. It has a covenant structure. God sovereignly obligated Himself to Abraham while assigning him a task: ‘You go…’ and ‘I will…’ Abram was to leave his father’s house in Ur, a city of the Chaldees and his father’s birthplace (220 miles southeast of Baghdad), and Yahweh would show him where to go. The promise included: a land; a blessing of fruitfulness and dominion; a great name; mercy along with all those who bless him and those who disdain him will be judged; this shows God’s absolute sovereignty over human history.

A good example of not superimposing our concepts and notions on the text comes when we read about God taking Abraham on a journey of faith. The defining event in the life of Abraham and the midpoint of Genesis takes place on Mount Moriah, where he binds his son Isaac as a sacrificial offering on the altar he had just built. Our emotions well up as we read God’s instructions to Abraham to slay his beloved son and offer him as a burnt offering before Yahweh. The conversation between father and thirty-eight-year-old son on their way up the mountain seems to be without emotion: Isaac spoke to Abraham and said, “My father… Look, the fire and the wood, but where is the lamb for a burnt offering?” Abraham replied, “My son, God will provide for Himself the lamb for a burnt offering” (Genesis 22: 7-8). In this patriarchal society a son would normally accept the patriarch’s word as final. This is why an evil patriarch corrupts his entire household.

We can only appreciate what is going on in the story when we keep the Mount Moriah climb in the context of the journey God took Abram on since the promise in Genesis 12:1-3. By the time God gave Abram a vision in Genesis 15, Abram had received enough tests and was able to question God enough to receive definite responses that God used to have Abraham respond in belief. His response results in one of the most profound statements in all of Scripture: ‘And he [Abram] believed in the Lord, and He accounted it to him for righteousness.’ God sealed his belief with a covenant in Genesis 15:7-21.

The test on Mount Moriah came only in the full context of God’s journey with Abram through many years and hundreds of miles of travel west from Ur to Haran to Canaan and as far south as Beersheba. He built numerous altars and worshiped throughout Canaan (e.g. Genesis 12:7; 13:4, 18); he took a faithless detour to Egypt where he denied Sarai as his wife (Genesis 12:10-20); he was generous to his nephew Lot (Genesis 13:5-13); he paid the tithe to Melchizedek, recognizing him as king and priest (Genesis 14:18-20); he received a vision where he questioned Yahweh’s promise of a great reward because he was childless (Genesis 15:1-5); along with his wife, he fell back on human custom in taking a slave-girl to bear a child for him (Genesis 16:1-15); he received another appearance from the Lord commanding him the rite of circumcision as the sign of the covenant, followed by changing his name from Abram (‘High Father’), to Abraham, meaning ‘Father of a Multitude’, and changing his wife’s name from Sarai (‘My Princess’), to Sarah, meaning ‘Princess’ (Genesis 17:1-27).

All of these lessons and testing taught Abraham that God was not there to serve him, but for God to use him. The years of testing were years full of self-interest and self-deceit. Then he learned that he was not in charge of his life. He found out that he could live in obedience to the presence of God. This is why obedience was the response to the Moriah test. Although the test covered three days, the context of it spanned across a hundred years, years in which the way he lived had been repeatedly put to the test.

Abraham needed testing, and God tested him. In the beginning of his journey he tried to get the most out of life on his own terms. The test results showed that he wanted God in the image he was accustomed to with his father’s household idols. Then he found in the final test that faith is not the way to God on his own terms, but the way of God to him on His terms. Abraham was not surprised to hear the voice tell him that there is a ram in the thicket. And Isaac was not surprised to end up not sacrificed. Not a word in the story indicates anything like surprise. It took a life journey of faith to know that to live a faith life means to be tested. His faith, repeatedly tested by sacrifice, was a way of life for Abraham. Each sacrifice left him with less of self and more of God. In the command to leave Ur, Abraham had abandoned his past. He then learned how to do that for thirty-five years or so, losing nothing in the process. Finally, he was asked to abandon his future. If he had not been accustomed to trusting God, it would have seemed like an outrageous command to sacrifice his son. Untested faith does not yet qualify as faith! The Genesis story of Abraham’s journey of faith gives us enough insight to know that God was doing something with the promise He gave Eve that her “Seed” would suffer in order to gain victory over the serpent’s dominion.

What would it be like traveling and living with Abraham and Sarah, as you watch them go through the tests of faith in an unseen God? How would you advise them in their failures? How would you identify with Sarah’s desperation for a child and laughter at the possibility of a child after passing the age of childbearing? What would it be like to watch Hagar in her desperation after being cast out of Abraham’s household because of Sarah’s scoffing? What would you ask Isaac after descending Mount Moriah with his father? What attributes and titles for God do you learn about as you read God’s Story with the Abraham and Sarah?
Some shared: God really understood the intent of Abraham’s heart – past, present, future – and reckoned him as righteousness. Abraham’s faith can be compared with the faith of Noah. As we read about Abraham’s journey in faith, we notice how God is interested in what we are doing with Him right now. If all we had as a description of faith was Abraham’s journey of faith, it would be enough to understand true faith in God. Our tests of faith may be hard, but this is how we get to the place where we can believe and obey like Abraham. His test on Mount Moriah showed that his faith was not in his son but in God. Could it have been that Abraham’s faith was in his seed instead of God? Abraham could have ‘sneaked in’ another child for the sacrifice in place of his son, in a way like he told the king that his wife was his sister. The practice during Abraham’s time was child sacrifice, and Abraham knew that God had brought him out of that pagan practice so that He would not approve of sacrificing his son. Faith is linked to obedience because it does not just know something but it does something – it is an action involving obedience. Faith is not simply in the mind. Abraham’s faith drives him to obedient service to God. God required he leave his father’s land of birth and his household of idolatry. Idolatry is not simply placed in an ‘idol’ as an object, but it is more of a lifestyle, an attitude. Reading about Abraham’s journey of faith makes us ask ourselves where we are in our faith journey. We don’t want the tests without knowing why things are happening as they are for us. Wanting to know the ‘why’ is not an exercise of faith. If we knew the ‘why’ of our test, it would not require faith! God’s testing of our faith is not for God to determine where we are in our journey, but it is for us to determine where we are in our faith journey. God’s promises to Abraham were very specific and Abraham remembers those specific promises. Abraham’s faith was pure because he did not bargain with God. It’s worth noting that Isaac is not mentioned again until Sarah’s death – maybe Isaac in essence really did ‘die’ symbolically. Tests of faith do not stop at a certain point in our lives, no matter how old we grow. When do we get to the place where Abraham was in his journey of faith? It will only be after we are ‘beat’ up in life. God ordained pain and suffering for our faith to grow.
We continue in our next session with the remaining patriarchs of Genesis and their journeys of faith…

Answers to quiz: (1) Cain, when he hit ‘a bell’ (Abel) (2) When a skunk boarded the ark with a cent (scent) (3) Noah floated his stock while everyone else was liquidated (4) Noah looked out of the Ark ‘n saw (Arkansas) (5) When Rachel lit upon her camel (6) Joseph, after Pharaoh made a ruler out of him (7) Joseph served in the courts of Pharaoh

Monday, October 18, 2010

Session 3: Genesis 1-11

If you desire a full summary of our session for ‘Thinking through the Bible’ on Sunday mornings, send your request by email to carlsonpj@gmail.com. This blog is a summary of what Paul presented, as well as what others shared during the session. If you are teaching this to others, you may want to read the full set of notes available to you in order to give your students more guidelines.

INTRODUCTION
How much have you really been ‘thinking’ while reading Genesis? Let’s take a quick quiz:
  1. What time of the day was Adam created?
  2. At what season did Eve eat the fruit?
  3. What was Eve’s telephone number?
  4. Who introduced the first walking stick?
Charts & Maps
The charts and maps used in our sessions are available to you by requesting them in an email to us – we will make electronic copies available to you. If you attend our session you may request printed copies. There is one chart (in three parts) used throughout the Old Testament. The following maps are available for Genesis:
·         Chronological Map 1: Modern Political Borders of the OT world
·         The World of the Patriarchs (including Abraham’s route)
·         The Ancient World showing the descendents of Noah’s sons
·         Abraham’s journey in detail
·         Land of Canaan during the Patriarchs

MEMORY
Let us recite the Books of the Bible in chronological order through the OT Books of Poetry (Genesis – Song of Solomon).
What do you see in this picture?
Let us remember that in our ‘Thinking through the Bible’ we are looking at God’s Story, and sometimes only noticing the ‘shadows’ before putting the entire ‘picture’ together.









THE PENTATEUCH
The Bible is made up of 66 Books. The first five are known as the ‘Pentateuch’, simply meaning a ‘five-volume book’. The Bible gives these Books such names as ‘the law’, ‘the book of the law of God’, and ‘the book of Moses’. Think of these five Books as a single book filled with God’s Story about His creation of the universe, and how He brought salvation to households, which He illustrates in His relationship with individuals, households, and a nation. His Story shows how He gave instructions to these people the ways in which they could relate to a holy and righteous God. 

A prominent theme throughout the Pentateuch is ‘God’s faithfulness’. Four major themes flow through the story to demonstrate God’s faithfulness:
·         ‘Election’: In their perfect relationship with God, Adam and Eve exercised their wills to disobey God. The entire creation became corrupted with sin, including their ‘free wills’. God dealt with this by choosing Jacob (name changed to Israel) as the father of all those who depend in faith on God rather than their own will. Everywhere throughout God’s Story, God’s choices do not contradict human choices and the resulting consequences. What is important in reading God’s Story is to notice that Scripture gives more attention to the will of God than to the will of people. When the story refers to human will, it usually describes it in negative forms, whereas God’s will emphasizes His good pleasure. And throughout the story people are held responsible for their choices.
·         ‘Covenant’: To the Hebrew people of the Pentateuch a covenant covered all human relationships. It was not a strange concept even before the law. It was the bond that united people in mutual obligations, be it a marriage contract, a business venture, or a verbal agreement. It was not a strange concept for God to demonstrate His relationship with them through a covenant. The difference was that God’s covenant was not between equal parties, but between a greater and a lesser partner. There are two attributes of God demonstrated in the covenant: (1) mercy – compassion for the miserable; withholding what we deserve; and (2) sovereignty – absolute right to relate according to His good pleasure. Share what you think it was like to receive God’s mercy and sovereignty. Think of walking with Adam and Eve (as someone said, Eve received much mercy); think of building with Noah; think of traveling with Abraham and Sarah; think of the responses of individuals in Abraham’s household; think of God’s titles such as a ‘Shield’, and ‘Almighty’.
·         ‘Law’: The law of God is central to the story throughout the Pentateuch. This collection of laws related in three central ways: (1) They related everything to ‘one’ God, so that any belief in plural gods threatened the relationship with the true God; (2) They showed concern for the underprivileged, such as women, strangers, slaves, and orphans; (3) They created a community spirit so that all Hebrews could share in God’s covenant. This did not stop with the Hebrews, but was extended to any foreigner joining them
·         ‘Exodus’: The great saving act of God for the Hebrews recorded in the Pentateuch is the exodus from bondage in Egypt. God proved His supremacy over all other gods through this deliverance.
Sin was no surprise to God. He was prepared for it. But this takes us to the beginning of God’s Story…

GENESIS
‘When there was a beginning, God already was.’ Elohim was there as the ‘uni-plural Godhead’, showing us that already present was God the ‘Creator’, God the ‘Son’, and God the ‘Holy Spirit’. What responses do you have to the knowledge that before there was a beginning God already was?
Some shared: God was there first because He always was; It’s a letter, ‘Dear (your name), I have you covered, Love God’; It is reassuring that God is always the same.

Without Genesis our knowledge of the creating God would be pitifully limited. God gives us an account of creation as a whole, and then makes the effort to give details of the creation of the human race. The world of matter was first; the system of life was next; and humankind was the climax of creation. The creation scene opens in a chaotic darkness, with the ‘Spirit’ hovering over the water, keeping them under control. We are not told ‘when’ creation took place. Nor are we given the details as to ‘how’ God brought the earth and life into being, other than that God said, “Let there be…” As each new account is given, God’s work begins with some form of His creative words, “Let there be…” At the end of each of His utterances, there is some form of the statement, “and it was so.”
We do know, however, that God was pleased with His creation to such an extent that ‘He rested on the seventh day from all His work which He had done.’ As much as Mark Twain said, “Man was made at the end of the week’s work, when God was tired”, we know that God ceased to work, not because He was tired, but because His work of creation was done. He provides humankind with a model for the cycle of labor and rest.
Many focus on the ‘how’ of creation. When we read and think through God’s Story, it becomes apparent that the focus is on God, so that when we read:
·         That ‘God’ created, it denies atheism with its teaching that there is no God; and it denies polytheism with its teaching that there are many gods.
·         That God ‘created’, it denies fatalism with its teaching of ‘chance’; and it denies evolution with its teaching of infinite ‘becoming’.
·         That God created the ‘heaven and earth’, it denies pantheism, which makes God and the universe one and the same thing; and it denies materialism, which says that matter is central to life.
·         “Let there be…” and there was, denies pre-existing material so that God created from nothing as an omnipotent and omnipresent God.
·         That God ‘created man in His own image’, which establishes humanity in a special relationship with God. This ‘likeness’ to God is so basic to man’s structure that the fall into sin did not destroy it. Genesis 2 uses a different title for God. It moves from ‘Elohim’, which is ‘God the Creator’, to ‘Yahweh Elohim’, which is ‘God in relation to His people’.
·         That ‘a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and they shall become one flesh’, which establishes that the marriage covenant begins with leaving all other relationships, in order to cleave, so that they become one flesh. As someone said, ‘Marriage is leaving, cleaving, and weaving! Our English confuses us because it gives two meanings to ‘cleave’: the first means to ‘split’ and the second means to ‘cling’. Mix these up and we’re in trouble in our relationships! Some translations say ‘be joined’, but sadly some read it as ‘be disjointed’! It is worthy to note that it was the ‘Lord God’ who said that it was “not good that man should be alone” (Genesis 2:18). It was not Adam’s idea that he was alone. As much as God took care of Adam’s aloneness by “making a helper comparable to him” (Genesis 2:18), he needed help to fulfill God’s command in Genesis 1:28: “Be fruitful and multiply; fill the earth and subdue it; have dominion… over every living thing…” What follows the ‘therefore’ of Genesis 2:24 is the means for Adam and Eve to obey the command to ‘be fruitful’ and ‘have dominion’.
What attributes of God are evident as He created?
Some shared: He is ‘Wisdom’ – He held things together; He is ‘Perfection’, ‘Beauty’, ‘Provider’, and He ‘sees His creation’.
How does it make you feel when ‘God saw everything that He had made, and indeed it was very good’ (Genesis 1:31)? What kinds of relationships do you see developing?
Some shared: God ensured that everything He created was ‘’good’ – that is awesome; it is reassuring that God not only created ‘man’, but also ‘woman’, for it says He created ‘them’; Satan was created good, but wanted equality with God; God gave mankind and the angels a choice; God rested and took time to reflect upon His creation and enjoy it; we need to rest to enjoy our work – sleep is good; it can be scary to think of God as omnipotent (all-powerful) and omnipresent (everywhere).

In the middle of the Garden of Eden was the ‘tree of life’, which indicates God’s presence as central to human existence. In the presence of God Adam and Eve chose evil over good. The second tree is ‘the tree of the knowledge of good and evil’, which indicates the existence of evil. God forbid them from partaking of this tree for them to know that they did not have to learn evil by experience. Sin complicates things! How do you respond to the question almost everyone asks at some time and in one way or another: “Where did evil come from?” There is no biblical support that God is the ‘author’ of evil in the sense of being the ‘agent’ of it, or being accountable for it. Yet, we know from Genesis 50:20 that Joseph understood people do the sinning, and are responsible for it, even though God is entitled to use evil for good. What do you think it was like to be separated from God because of sin, both for Adam and Eve, and God? How do you respond to God’s call to Adam, “Where are you?” (Genesis 3:9). And to the question to Eve, “What is this you have done?” (Genesis 3:13).
Some shared: God wanted Adam and Eve to think about what they had done; the questions do not have to do with God, but with Adam and Eve; the questions from God shows Adam and Eve accountable to their Creator; Eve took things into her own hands, showing pride; we try to help God a little; God has His way and we want to make it happen; somehow Adam learned about sacrifices; until the Fall, there was one rule: do not eat…; the ‘tree of life’ shows that we were not intended to die; if they partook of the tree they would live in sin forever; when we ask where evil came from, it is like asking where God came from; evil is a matter of fact, and maybe we don’t need to know more; evil does let us see the full glory of God; those who lived in Genesis seemed satisfied to know that evil existed without questioning its origin; evil is the opposite of good; evil is illustrated in the Bible more than it is defined; when I try to understand the source and consequence of evil, all I need to do is look at my own life; evil may be the absence of God; when Eve took her focus off God, she sinned – so it is with us; we complain so much about creation that it seems like there is nothing we can appreciate anymore;

God is the center of the Bible, and we are privileged to see Him revealed in many ways. We learn of Him as a merciful God when He gives the solution to evil by telling the devil that through the woman he deceived, there would one day come a ‘Seed’ that will destroy him. Genesis 3:15 is the first promise to fallen mankind. To trace the line of this seed in Genesis, we need simply pay attention in the story’s reference to the seed of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. Can you imagine what went through Eve’s mind when she heard God speak about a ‘Seed’ through her?
Some shared: the ‘Seed’ was the seed of life; it provided Eve with hope; the story seems to indicate that Cain and then her other children, could be that promise of a ‘Seed’;

Along with the first family came the first murder! Cain’s attitude toward God cost his brother Abel his life, and it links Cain to the devil. Cain is consigned to judgment by alienating him from the ground and from society. We have the first description of worship in the behavior of Cain and Abel. The ‘offering’ brought by the brothers means ‘tribute’, which is a gift of an inferior to a superior. Each brother brought a tribute appropriate to his vocation. God was entitled to the first share produced by plants and by animals, and the best of what a worshiper had to offer. Abel brought both the first and the best; Cain brought neither. The worshiper and his offering are inseparable: God favored Abel and his gift; He did not look with favor on Cain and his gift. The reason is given in Genesis 4:7 (NLT): “Sin is crouching at the door, eager to control you. But you must subdue it and be its master.” Cain’s anger led him to murder his brother, showing that there is a very short step from rebellion against God to bloodshed. How did Cain subsequently relate to his family? How do you think Cain’s parents related to him as a murderer? How did God subsequently relate to Cain?
Some shared: Eve felt the pain of her son’s death, and maybe understood something of God’s feeling of hurt; the parents very possibly felt responsible for their son’s sin; the things that trouble me about my own children is what I see of myself; the story so far does not explain what ‘type’ of offering God expected, but it does explain that Cain yielded to sin, which led to his anger; it seems that the focus is on the attitude of the one bringing the offering; the type of offering was a tribute, and so does not necessarily focus on a sacrifice for sin, but on thanksgiving.

Cain started the first civilization. Six generations of his family are given in Genesis 4. Remember that generations in the Pentateuch varied from one hundred years in the time of Abraham, and as the story develops, they are reduced to thirty-eight years. Genesis 5 sets the scene by giving the genealogy of Adam. The genealogies do not tell us the years between Adam and the Flood. But the taint of sin and its deadly stamp on the human personality remained all too clear.
Modern readers of biblical genealogies should be aware of the way in which familiar terms were used, such as:
·         ‘Father’: not always one who bore children; could simply denote a learned, older man who was not even a relative.
·         ‘Mother’: could be a symbolic description of a woman who exercised the love and care normally given by mothers.
·         ‘Son’: could actually be a grandson or a great-grandson.
·         ‘Daughter’: could be bound together by a treaty.
‘Now it came to pass…’ (Genesis 6:1) gives a clue to the family line of Adam: ‘Then the Lord saw that the wickedness of man was great… and that every intent of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually...’ (Genesis 6:5). It was time for the Lord to grieve deeply over the evil state of humanity. What is it like for God to be ‘sorry’ that He had created man on the earth?
Some shared: if we know how God feels about sin, and that He does not respond just with anger but with real pain, it would keep us from sin; we think of our own emotions, but don’t think of God’s – we need to really think about how God felt; when God was ‘sorry’ He was grieved, heartbroken, and filled with regret; when we focus only on our emotions, we forget that we are made in God’s ‘likeness’, which include His emotions; our God is a patient and merciful God who gives us a way out of sin; when we realize how much our sin causes God to sorrow, it is a good time for us to partake of communion and reflect on God’s work. This ended our session, so we will pick up with the flood next time, and this blog will be updated with comments.

Outward temptation encountered by Adam and Eve degenerated into inward temptation: the ‘thoughts’ of his heart (Genesis 6:5). God began taking the step toward a chosen nation by separating the righteous from the wicked. He did this through a flood. Noah’s first act on exiting the ark marked his faith in God. The way of approach to God was still by the altar of sacrifice. Genesis 8:21 indicates that the Lord received the ‘satisfying’ aroma. As with all covenants God makes, His agreement was not solely with Noah, but with “you and with your descendants after you…”  It continues to include “every living creature that is with you…” (Genesis 9:9). God’s covenants are with ‘households’, thus binding His people together. God repeats His command to Adam and Eve: ‘So God blessed Noah and his sons, and said to them: “Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth” (Genesis 9:1).

Even a completely fresh start does not change people. The shameful story of Noah’s drunkenness leads God’s Story into an earth united with one language against God. Hopefully, you don’t really believe the legend promoted by the seventeenth-century Swedish writer, Andreas Kempe, that in the Garden of Eden God spoke Swedish and Adam spoke Danish, and the serpent spoke French! Human rebellion is demonstrated by the attempt to build the tower of Babel in an effort to be independent of God. ‘Babel’ means ‘gate of God’. In His mercy, the Lord spread the nations with different languages according to Noah’s three sons, Shem, Ham, and Japheth. Human unity increases rebellion against God! What would it be like to no longer be able to communicate with your own brother?

There are five patriarchal fathers: Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Joseph, and Job (not mentioned in Genesis, but it is suggested he fits just after Genesis 11:26, possibly making him forty years old at Noah’s death). Genesis easily falls into two main sections: God’s dealings with humans in general (chs. 1-11); God’s dealings with those He has chosen to be His special people (chs. 12-50). This is a good place to stop and look forward as God’s Story continues with another covenant.
Continue reading and thinking through Genesis, and continue into Exodus…

Answers to quiz: (1) A little before Eve (2) Early in the Fall (3) Adam 812 (4) Eve, when she gave Adam a little ‘Cain’ (cane)